Home  •  Forum  •  Blogs  •  E-Mail  •  Support Categories
MyCopper Categories Finance Travel Real Estate Games Autos Entertainment
Welcome Guest Active Topics |

156 Pages «<7677787980>»
Catholic Truths and Myths Options
dajcat
#1541 Posted : Wednesday, November 18, 2009 11:29:19 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 6/6/2008
Posts: 2,167
If I quote scripture Firebird to show you that it is Anathema it was the bible (ST. Paul that said you were accurded) and you say that I do it because I hate, Why did Jesus and His Apostles quote scripture? Did they hate also.? No I never said I wanted to see the RCC fail , What I would like to see it do is repent . You have no documentary proof that any of the Apostles prayed to any departed spirit. James was killed by Herod and yet no one prayed to James. The RCC did not give us the Bible. Jerome copied the then existant Septuagint into Latin giving us the Vulgate Bible.. You take too much credit for God's work. Again what have I to be jealous of. If I were jealous I would become a RC. Sorry I don't believe the Holy Spirit guided you into praying to saints, gave you Purgatory or Indulgences. If it makes you feel better then believe them. I still believe they are false teachings. dajcat
cfirebird65
#1542 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:05:44 AM

Rank: King




Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 2,051
[quote=dajcat]If I quote scripture Firebird to show you that it is Anathema it was the bible (ST. Paul that said you were accurded) and you say that I do it because I hate, Why did Jesus and His Apostles quote scripture?
Even the devil can quote Scripture. You are not Jesus nor are you His Apostle. Quoting Scripture to suit your anti-Catholic bias is HATE and none of it is what the authors intended. Jesus loves me too much to send a liar like you to teach me His truth.

What I want to see is that the RCC apologize
Gratuitous apologizing for the crimes of other ages and people is dangerous humbug, said C. S. Lewis, a Christian. I would like to see YOU APOLOGIZE FOR YOUR WILFUL SLANDER AND LIES ABOUT CATHOLICS! Your behavior scandalizes those who don't use your bucket of slop.

Sorry I don't believe the Holy Spirit guided you into praying to saints, gave you Purgatory or Indulgences.
Sorry, I don't believe the Holy Spirit guided you to post rubbish. You say you only preach the Word of God. Liar Again, here is another post showing nothing about the Word of God - only more of your usual anti-Catholic froth. I still believe you are teach errors from your personal opinions. You twist God's Word in our doctrines and slander us. Shame on you I also believe you are ignorant, uneducated about our beliefs and your own religion, confused, conflicted and troubled instead of being at peace with yourself. You can't even formulate a coherent response for the Trinitarian doctrine. It is hilarious to see you getting your knickers in a twist when arguing with Jerry. And just who in their right minds would want to believe anything you say when you lie constantly? You keep saying the RCC did not give us the Bible. Jerome copied the then existant Septuagint into Latin giving us the Vulgate Bible. History shows that Jerome was a Catholic and one of our Catholic Saints, that it was the Catholic Bishops who canonized the OT/NT. You are intellectually dishonest, deliberately distort history out of malice and are unable to show proof for your assertions. Your brand of religious zealotry is fading into the sunset. That is because people interested in their eternal salvation do not want your blank check religion saying anything you want, anytime you want, irrespective of what the Bible teaches.ThumbDown Even the heathens do that! And none of it gives the fullness of God's salvation plan. Liar





"What we do in life echoes in eternity." - Maximus
cfirebird65
#1543 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 1:44:59 AM

Rank: King




Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 2,051

General Rebuttals - cont/-

4. THE FALLACY OF INDIFFERENCE?
Christ died for all, and does not say that He did so for members of any particular Church. He does not mention either Catholicism or Protestantism.

The teaching of Christ clearly condemns Protestant principles, and insists upon the acceptance of Catholic principles. He did die for all who would accept Him, but one does not accept Him who rejects knowingly the very definite and particular religion He gave to the world. And He predicted that that religion would be characterized by unity of doctrine, holiness of moral precepts, catholicity or universality, and continuous succession from the Apostles.

The denominations are necessary to save us from the dictation of Priests.
the denominations were not necessary according to the mind of Christ. He prayed that all might be one, as He and His Father are one. St. Paul said that even though an Angel from heaven were to preach a gospel differing from that already given, he should be regarded as accursed. No one had any right to establish the denominations, with their varying doctrines apart from the religion Christ gave us.

I admit that it is a pity that there is so much conflict.
It is ten thousand times a pity. But remember that the Catholic Church did not start the conflict. She cannot be blamed for the domestic troubles of Protestantism. All Catholics at least are in doctrinal unity.

But why keep insisting that the Catholic Church is the only Church?
Because Christ said, "If a man will not hear the Church, let him be as the heathen." He did not say, "If a man will not hear a portion of the Gospel in man-made substitute churches."

You cannot deny that you are bigoted in your exclusive claims.
Bigotry is blind zeal. It is not bigotry to say that a thing cannot be true if its opposite is proved to be correct. Truth must exclude error.

We are as entitled to our opinions as you are to yours.
You are. And you might be able to think out ideas just as valuable as ourselves. But here it is not a question of human opinions. It is a question of God's teaching, and neither your opinions nor our opinions have any value if they contradict that. Catholic doctrine is not our opinion, but His doctrine who sent the Church to teach in His name.

But are you not obliged by the law of charity? Christ said, "Do unto others as you would have them do to you."
We are obliged by the law of charity. But charity does not forbid one to tell the truth. It forbids blaming people who, through no fault of their own, do not know the truth. Nor would the Catholic Church wish Protestants to admit that she is right if she were not right. And since she can prove that they are not right, she is not doing to them what she would not have them do to her in denying the correctness of their religion.

All the same, your claims are insulting to Protestants, and they are human beings just as Catholics.
The Catholic Church has to condemn Protestantism as a system. But she desires to insult no single Protestant. That Protestants are human beings does not prove their religion true. Otherwise the fact that Catholics are human beings also would prove their religion true. As a matter of fact, in so far as Protestants are human beings we Catholics love them, and it is our very interest in them which makes us want to give them the best religion in the world—Catholicism. Protestantism is not good enough for them.

Your Church is doing more to prevent reunion than any other Church.
That is a great compliment to the Catholic Church when we consider the conditions others lay down as the basis of reunion. For it means that she is doing more than any other church to keep intact the religion entrusted to her by Christ. She steadily refuses to let her heart run away with her head by admitting that whatever sincere but mistaken men would like to be true is good enough, and that what Christ exactly taught does not really matter.


More to follow/-




"What we do in life echoes in eternity." - Maximus
cfirebird65
#1544 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:08:39 AM

Rank: King




Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 2,051

General Rebuttals - cont/-

4. THE FALLACY OF INDIFFERENCE?
At least Protestantism is more tolerant than Catholicism. I am an Anglican, but I do not say that I am right. I accept everyone's belief as he thinks best, and not criticizing others

You take up an extraordinary position. If you do not say that you are right, you cannot have definite grounds for your belief, and such belief is credulity.

And do you really believe in everyone believing in his own belief? Whether that belief be right or wrong? If so, you believe in people believing in error. But Christ came precisely to stop people from believing in error. Far from allowing people to believe in their own beliefs, He commanded them to give up their previous beliefs, and believe in what He taught, if they wished to save their souls. I believe with you in not criticizing others. I give them credit for sincerity and goodness. But it is quite lawful to criticize their theories.


But in the end, is not religion a matter of opinion?
If you exclude the Catholic Church, I'm afraid it is. That other churches think so is shown by the amazing exchanges of pulpits and attendances. But the Catholic Church is a different thing altogether. Until we prove a tiling it is a matter of opinion. Thus before Australia was discovered, it was a matter of opinion as to whetlier a southern continent existed or not. But once discovered, it was no longer a matter of opinion. So, too, if God had never given a revelation about religion, it might be a matter of opinion. But once God speaks in a definite way, it is no longer a matter of opinion.

When the Creator speaks, the creature must simply accept. Now God sent His Son, Jesus Christ, who established one definite Church, to which He gave His teaching authority. This does not look like religion being a matter of opinion. Here we have God's decision, and we must accept it. If our human opinions suggest anything against the teaching of Christ, or against the teaching of His Church, we just renounce our own fallible ideas as being the foolish notions of untaught children. The Protestant clings to his own opinions whether they are in harmony with God's explicit teachings or not. Nor does he make much effort to find out what those teachings are. But God would no more admit that the religion revealed by Him is a mere matter of opinion than your grocer would admit that the amount owing to him is a mere matter of opinion.


Would it not be better to say that religion is a matter of conscience?
No. If the individual conscience is to be the guide, there will be as many religions as consciences. There are right consciences and wrong consciences. Conscience is right if it squares with the laws of God. It is warped if it be at variance with the will of God. However, if conscience alone matters, why did not Christ leave us all to our consciences, instead of carefully teaching His Apostles a definite set of doctrines to be preached and to be believed? Conscience must accept the teachings of Christ, who could neither be deceived, nor deceive us.

Why try to convert people to the Catholic Church?
Why did Christ try to convert people to His special doctrines? And whv did He send His Church to teach all nations? If God gives the truth to man by sending His Son, is it not better to have that truth to guide one's conduct? Or is it better to be in partial or total ignorance, omitting much that ought to be done, and being forgiven by God only because not knowing any better? To know the truth and live exactly as God intends is much better than asking to be excused from it on the plea of ignorance.

I know that Protestants are ignorant of Catholicity, but are not Catholics ignorant of Protestantism?
Very often. But there is this difference. The Catholic who does not understand Protestantism does not know the wrong thing. The Protestant who does not know Catholicism does not know the right thing. I personally know both, having been brought up in Protestantism, which I renounced in favor of Catholicism.

Have Catholics any advantages not possessed by good Protestants?
All things else being equal, and strictly from the viewpoint of the religions, Catholics have many advantages. They have the full truth contained in Sacred Scripture and in the teaching Church. The Protestant accepts only part of Scripture, and has no God-appointed guide. Certainly a man with full information as to the road leading to a given destination has greater advantages than one with defective information. Again, Catholics have more means of grace than non-Catholics. They have the sacrifice of the Mass, and seven Sacraments. You may say that Christ gives grace at times independently of the Sacraments instituted by Him for this purpose. But why should He, when He definitely institutes seven Sacraments for the purpose? And even granting that He does give certain graces to those in good faith, those graces are not so plentiful, nor of the same nature as the special Sacramental graces.

You insist, then, that not any form of Christianity will do, but that we ought to join the Catholic Church?
Yes. As a matter of fact, a close study of other forms will suggest only reasons for abandoning them, whilst an equally close study of Catholicism intensifies the conviction that in the Catholic Church, and in her alone, can the full truth be found.


More to follow/-








"What we do in life echoes in eternity." - Maximus
cfirebird65
#1545 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:25:46 AM

Rank: King




Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 2,051
Quote by nicolini

As a baptized, communed and confirmed Roman Catholic. I appreciate the structure and traditions I have been tought. I'm also grateful for the people in the Catholic churhces I went to that I have been given great friendship and support in my faith journey. I'm glad I got to see FIRST HAND how the Catholic church has helped others and loved God to do the things they were put on this earth to do.....I come here and get preached to like I dont have a working mind of my own or a faith history of my own based on the fact that some have a few decades ahead of me....I was falsely judged based on what tidbits of drama and rhetoric they have been fed SECOND HAND and that is not right. One even mentioned after I merely started posting here on copper that I was an anti-semite.....Not too long ago another person quite exaspiratively labeled me a "psycho babbling dumbass" after I called him on his audaciously hateful and spiteful behavior......Fiona. If you are happy being a devout and empassioned Roman Catholic, Knock yourself out, Sister. What you put your faith in governs your life and what you see and do is your business and your blessing as well. To be whitness to what GOd does to others in what you have wrote about here (ie, your culinary friend) is one of the many gifts that God gives us. To be able to whitness to His amazing power and love. Catholics have that gift by our stories of our miracles, that show that God is around. We do have a rich and long long history. Most have a few centuries at best....Nic


Nic, great post! I can sense your frustration with trying to hold on to your faith while others slam it with their erroneous beliefs. I too, have been wrongfully called worse names than you even heard of. You know who are those who did so. I can share your pain and sorrow at such name-calling when it was not justified. BTW, thank you for speaking out on that shamanic ditty of weenie's. It is good that you saw right through his ignorance and ill will. We need more spirit-filled young adults like you who can speak out in truth and justice. Your Nana and Papa would have been so proud of you. Dancing

Good to see that you still have that same spark and spirit in case you have started your 21-day juice fast. Just go easy on the fasting, girl! The most I did was a 3-day fast. Another friend of mine did 14 days and looked quite well for about six months. But her cancer came back and she finally succumbed to it. I miss her terribly. She was such a tower of strength for me during my trials. Cancer loves sugar even if it is a natural one. It is like putting fire to gasoline. Also, the immune system when it is already compromised, can't handle sugar well. Incidentally, did you hear from the Cleveland Clinic about your tests? How did they go? If you'd rather not say anything, I fully understand. OTH, you can PM me if you want to talk about it off-forum.

Also, I was relieved to hear from Martin. He is back in Ohio. But the financial situation is really tough for him. Do keep him in your prayers as I do in mine for both of you.

Abundant blessings to you! Angel






"What we do in life echoes in eternity." - Maximus
kspletzer
#1546 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 7:09:09 AM

Rank: King


Joined: 3/25/2007
Posts: 2,635
Location: Heaven Bound
"Even the devil can quote Scripture. You are not Jesus nor are you His Apostle. Quoting Scripture to suit your anti-Catholic bias is HATE and none of it is what the authors intended. Jesus loves me too much to send a liar like you to teach me His truth."

Quoteing Scripture is Wrong--- OH MY-- OH MY. Now you have gone off the deep end.
Quoting scripture is NOT AntiCatholic in any sense. As you said - YOU are not Jesus or are you His Apostle. What we have is his word that he and his Apostles handed down to us- that WE are to use to bring this world to Christ. Not go against other Christians - even one who claims to be a Christian and bashes ANYONE who does not quote from the RCC Bible or is not a RC.

John 3:16 says-"For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, WHOSOEVER believeth in Him should not perish but have everlasting life"
John 3:17-- "For god did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved"

Those 2 verses do not say anything about a Church or Denomination. Just to be a Believer. You are not showing Christ's Love at all.
nicolini
#1547 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:29:54 AM

Rank: King



Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 1,931
Location: Purgatory
I shall like to meet a protestant that can show true love for God and love for their neighbor. Fia, It took me a while to be forgiving of the attitudes I received from some from Epic (a First Alliance sister church gathering) which is a protestant denomination. I suppose just as it took them a while to get to feel comfortable around me. You might like it or at least appreciate what they do, if you want you are welcome to check it out www.epicfaith.org is the addy. Believe me i'm not trying to convert you, but to help you see that the people on this forum are not the only ones (protestant) who believe and act as you have seen here. It's helped me to be more understanding. I try to be but yes, it's hard. especially if you dont hear their voices and just see typed words.

Our saints I do believe existed. There are town and history records of those people. (ie: Joan of Arc DID exist. The Fatima children DID exist and so forth) The angel-saints are mentioend in the bible so we're covered there too. So the validity of our faith is not a worry for me. The validity of what Epic teaches me too is bible based so I can breathe easy knowing that its' there and been there and recognized by both Catholic and Protestants alike. (Everyone has the same Matthew Mark Luke and John so we're all good there, get me?) ok...so..moving on.

When I see things like what people tell me that has nothing to do with what the bible says, It does worry me. WHen I'm told that we'll get cought up in a comet in the sky or that someone is Jesus and he's to sleep with 14 year old girls, (ie: David Koresh & The Halebop Jello Gang, disrespectfully) then I know it's not for real.

Actually, that sounds like a really bad neo-hipster garage band. hm



"I'm not here. Leave a message!"

cfirebird65
#1548 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:48:40 AM

Rank: King




Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 2,051
[quote=kspletzer]Quoteing Scripture is Wrong--- OH MY-- OH MY. Now you have gone off the deep end.
This is about the dumbest post you have ever written. Ignorant wisecracks addle the brain. Already, you have shown a propensity not to use your brain. Judging that others have gone off the deep end tells that you have been there yourself with cutgrass.

Quoting scripture is NOT AntiCatholic in any sense.
It is anti-Catholic in every sense but you are obviously clueless why. You are the poster girl for the most vitriolic anti-Catholic threads where you cherry-picked Bible verses and neatly packaged them around your psycho-mystical poppycock. And you called it God’s Word. It was actually the devil’s work because:
a) You are not an infallible interpreter of Scripture;
b) Nowhere has God asked you to gaze at your crystal ball to foretell end times with your select Bible verses, nor has He asked you to read your tea leaves to foretell to Catholics your anti-Catholic prophecies.
c) The Bible does not give you permission to use your personal interpretation. What you bring with you is disgusting, anti-Catholic prejudice in the guise of your pseudo-Christianity.


WE are to use to bring this world to Christ. Not go against other Christians –
So why are you doing that, instead of promoting your anti-Catholic propaganda and hatred of our religion? Yes, it is hate because lies and deliberate misrepresentation of our beliefs is not love - it is HATE! And why do you come here to enable liars and deceivers like yourself to attack us? Isn’t that malicious and spiteful of you to go against Catholic Christians and then talk up the good talk with forked tongue?

John 3:16 & John 3:17
No one said these verses had anything to do with a denomination. You are spinning another whopper. Again, YOU cherry-picked a verse from Scripture - John 3:16 - to support your fantasy that Jesus established a Church of Believers. That was YOUR ERROR citing a Church, not mine! I told you that the only Church that existed at that time was the one Christ established and it was the Catholic Church. Since you and those you enable, don't believe it, I gave an objective non-Catholic reference from Encyclopedia Britannica. I even proved it from documented historical and verifiable patristic writings on this thread. My suggestion stands. You would use your time better for spiritual profit by knitting socks for the homeless or taking them home for Thanksgiving. That will show a Christian spirit instead of thumping your Bible uselessly without understanding what the writers intended, or even what the beliefs of the early Christians were. Persisting in wrongdoing by bashing Catholics with lies, and errors is not Christian. So don't pontificate when you do not set a Christian example. Don't keep making a fool of yourself by talking about our religion when you are ignorant about it. Have more respect for yourself, then you will respect others' beliefs.


"What we do in life echoes in eternity." - Maximus
cfirebird65
#1549 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:13:50 PM

Rank: King




Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 2,051
Quote by nicolini
I shall like to meet a protestant that can show true love for God and love for their neighbor. Fia, It took me a while to be forgiving of the attitudes I received from some from Epic (a First Alliance sister church gathering) which is a protestant denomination. I suppose just as it took them a while to get to feel comfortable around me. You might like it or at least appreciate what they do, if you want you are welcome to check it out www.epicfaith.org is the addy. Believe me i'm not trying to convert you, but to help you see that the people on this forum are not the only ones (protestant) who believe and act as you have seen here. It's helped me to be more understanding. I try to be but yes, it's hard. especially if you dont hear their voices and just see typed words.....When I see things like what people tell me that has nothing to do with what the bible says, It does worry me.

I have met some of the finest Protestant Christians in my neighborhood and at work and some of the worst on this forum and elsewhere. I remember so well the anti-Catholic discrimination of being overlooked for plum jobs that were given to Protestants or Jews. That is until I worked my way up the ladder, forgiving those who tried to get me fired. Finally, those same ones were reporting to me. Those that slacked off did not stay long on the job. Others got good raises despite what they tried to do behind my back. But in fairness to them, they performed well and had mouths to feed at home. I learned then how to forgive from the heart when I could have given them the boot!

I don't usually go to non-Catholic Churches any more because I was told by my Jesuit guide that Jesus is not present in their symbols of bread and wine. Hence there is no divine protection from other spirits. I pondered on what he said and realized that he was right. Christ did promise to be with His Church always and not allow the gates of hell to prevail against it. Our Book of Revelation is our Catholic Mass. There are some soothsayers who claim that it is about the Pope who is the anti-Christ and the RCC that is the Whore of Babylon. Catholics believe Jesus is truly present on our altar in the consecrated bread and wine and the angels ward off any spirits that seek to devour our souls. Thus, fed on the living Bread, we can be bread for others on the way! Only then, if we received Him in a state of grace and living lives of holiness and sanctity, can we perform superhuman work for Him and do the deeds He did.



"What we do in life echoes in eternity." - Maximus
nicolini
#1550 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:26:02 PM

Rank: King



Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 1,931
Location: Purgatory
In refrence to the previous post about sugar.

I saw this silicone tart pan at the grocery store and ....I got a little excited it was on sale....and well.. .

I cheated.

I'm waiting for the strawberry Jell-O to gelatize on my chocolate fudge Pilsberry mini-cake, and I'm toppling it with whip creme and cinnamon'd strawberries.

Yes I know. I know. With my appetite lately, I think I'll probably end up having one bite and giving it away though, so..
"I'm not here. Leave a message!"

kspletzer
#1551 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:46:03 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 3/25/2007
Posts: 2,635
Location: Heaven Bound


4. THE FALLACY OF INDIFFERENCE?
Christ died for all, and does not say that He did so for members of any particular Church. He does not mention either Catholicism or Protestantism.The teaching of Christ clearly condemns Protestant principles (WHAT!!!!!!!!!!! and WHERE), and insists upon the acceptance of Catholic principles. He did die for all who would accept Him, but one does not accept Him who rejects knowingly the very definite and particular religion He gave to the world (He did NOT give us the RCC!!). And He predicted that that religion would be characterized by unity of doctrine, holiness of moral precepts, catholicity or universality, and continuous succession from the Apostles.

the denominations were not necessary according to the mind of Christ. He prayed that all might be one, as He and His Father are one. St. Paul said that even though an Angel from heaven were to preach a gospel differing from that already given, he should be regarded as accursed. No one had any right to establish the denominations, with their varying doctrines apart from the religion Christ gave us.-(NO ONE should be so arrogant to think only they have the truth)

I admit that it is a pity that there is so much conflict.It is ten thousand times a pity.( Jesus Christ would totally agree here!!) But remember that the Catholic Church did not start the conflict (They did by insisting on their doctrines as believe or die!!) . She cannot be blamed for the domestic troubles of Protestantism. All Catholics at least are in doctrinal unity.

]But why keep insisting that the Catholic Church is the only Church?
Because Christ said, "If a man will not hear the Church, let him be as the heathen." He did not say, "If a man will not hear a portion of the Gospel in man-made substitute churches." (He also said don't make up stories or lie)

You cannot deny that you are bigoted in your exclusive claims.Bigotry is blind zeal. It is not bigotry to say that a thing cannot be true if its opposite is proved to be correct. Truth must exclude error. (RCC Bigotry is Anti-Christian)

We are as entitled to our opinions as you are to yours.You are. And you might be able to think out ideas just as valuable as ourselves.But here it is not a question of human opinions. It is a question of God's teaching, and neither your opinions nor our opinions have any value if they contradict that.(Here we have interrupting the scriptures to suit your RCC beliefs) Catholic doctrine is not our opinion, but His doctrine who sent the Church to teach in His name.

But are you not obliged by the law of charity? Christ said, "Do unto others as you would have them do to you."We are obliged by the law of charity. But charity does not forbid one to tell the truth. It forbids blaming people who, through no fault of their own, do not know the truth. Nor would the Catholic Church wish Protestants to admit that she is right if she were not right. And since she can prove that they are not right, she is not doing to them what she would not have them do to her in denying the correctness of their religion.(Poppy-cock-- The RCC does not have a hold on the truth-- only the Bible does)

All the same, your claims are insulting to Protestants, and they are human beings just as Catholics.VERY INSULTING!!
The Catholic Church has to condemn Protestantism as a system. But she desires to insult no single Protestant. That Protestants are human beings does not prove their religion true. Otherwise the fact that Catholics are human beings also would prove their religion true. As a matter of fact, in so far as Protestants are human beings we Catholics love them,(YOU HAVE A STRANGE WAY OF SHOWING IT) and it is our very interest in them which makes us want to give them the best religion in the world—Catholicism. Protestantism is not good enough for them. (We have the best- Jesus Christ, God the father and God the Holy Spirit-- we don't need any "religion"wink

Your Church is doing more to prevent reunion than any other Church.Certainly some RC's do)
That is a great compliment to the Catholic Church when we consider the conditions others lay down as the basis of reunion. For it means that she is doing more than any other church to keep intact the religion entrusted to her by Christ. She steadily refuses to let her heart run away with her head by admitting that whatever sincere but mistaken men would like to be true is good enough, and that what Christ exactly taught does not really matter.


YOUR Church is one that Jesus Christ would agree holds many true Christians and will welcome them to Heaven. Some of them will be part of the Rapture. Some will not show Charity for his Children and will be Left Behind. Some one told me that one of the recent Pope John's stated that he believes that a future Pope will be the False Prophet in the Tribulation and head of the False One World Religion. I will try to find that quote.
kspletzer
#1552 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:53:32 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 3/25/2007
Posts: 2,635
Location: Heaven Bound
This final seven year period will begin when the future Roman prince "confirms a covenant" that will involve the nation of Israel and the city of Jerusalem. This researcher has been led to the belief that this future Roman prince will be the False Prophet of bible prophecy, and that he may indeed be a leader of the post-rapture apostate Roman Catholic Church. It is clear from scripture that the False Prophet will be a powerful and well respected spiritual leader and there is none more powerful or more respected in religious matters than the Roman Catholic Pope.

Catholic commentators such as the late Father Malachi Martin, Kathleen Keating (The Final Warning) and numerous Catholic visionaries are united in the belief that the Catholic Church will at one time be led by a figure they call the Anti-Pope who will turn against the fundamentals of the Christian faith and accept the Antichrist.

It has also been revealed by numerous sources that the Vatican is currently intimately involved in the Middle East peace process. Yassir Arafat has been known to make frequent visits to see the Pope, and the secular Israeli leadership has often consulted with him as well. The goal of the Vatican appears to be the control of religious sites within Jerusalem's Old City. Secular Israeli journalist Barry Chamish, who covers the peace process with a critical eye, has this to say,
www.redmoonrising.com

kspletzer
#1553 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:01:00 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 3/25/2007
Posts: 2,635
Location: Heaven Bound
Fifty Years in the Church of Rome
By CHARLES CHINIQUY
The life story of Charles Chiniquy, who was a priest in the Roman Catholic Church for 25 years.
"Charles Chiniquy (1809-1899) a Canadian Presbyterian convert from Roman Catholicism, born at Kamouraska, Quebec, Canada of Roman Catholic parents, and studied at the college of Nicolet, Canada, professor of belles-lettres there after graduation until 1833. in 1833 ordained a Roman Catholic priest, and until 1846 was vicar and curate in the province of Quebec where he established the first temperance society, winning the title "Apostle of Temperance of Canada." In 1851 established an extensive Roman Catholic colony at Kankakee, Illinois. In 1858 left the church of Rome and joined the Canadian Presbyterian Church taking his congregation at Kankakee with him. Lectured in England and in Australia (1878-1882). Published a number of books and tracts on temperance and anti-Romanism, some of which became very popular and were translated into several languages." (From "The Wycliffe Biographical Dictionary of the Church," page 90, Elgin S. Moyer, 1982, ©Moody Press, Chicago, IL)



Charles Chiniquy
1809-1899

kspletzer
#1554 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:03:32 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 3/25/2007
Posts: 2,635
Location: Heaven Bound
Thirty Years in Hell

...OR...

"From Darkness to Light."

BY



Ex-Priest, Bernard Fresenborg,

Who for thirty long years tread the slippery and deceitful path
of abhorrent Catholicism, but who to-day stands at the
Vatican's door, with the torch of Protestant wisdom,
and denounces Popery with a tongue
livid with the power of
a living God.

Like a Meteor From God's Throne,

This great book has stirred America from center to circumference.
About 400 Large Pages,
And each Page a stinging rebuke to Roman Catholicism.
Published by
North-American Book House,
St. Louis, No.

Entered according to act of Congress in the year 1904, by
NORTH-AMERICAN BOOK HOUSE,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, Washington, D. C.





Author's Announcement.

A structure of enlightment is to be built in this land, which to finish, every man of intellectual power must contribute.

The structure which I refer to, is the structure of "SPIRITUAL LIBERTY," as the spiritual part of man must have room to expand and grow the same as any other God-given privilege that man is blessed with.

Unless we grow in faith we become dwarfs in the worship of God.

Those who go forth into the world and profess to be the teachers of men should be giants of intellect and fully prepared to contribute to this monument of "SPIRITUAL LIBERTY."

These giants are the "KNIGHTS OF THE SPIRIT," who stand upon the summit of righteousness and proclaim an intelligent God to a sinful world.

Many say they do not feel that they possess the ability to contribute to this structure of "SPIRITUAL LIBERTY," but I say, none who possess the power to reason are exempt, for if they cannot place in the

devil THIRTY YEARS IN HELL

arch of this structure the golden "key-stone" that shall securely bind this structure together, they can carry mortar or stones, which is as imperative in this structure, as the polished "Cap stone" which shall complete this great pyramid of emancipation.

I do not crave to have my name engraven in bold letters upon the "Cap stone" of this structure, but I do desire to contribute my mite towards the completion of this grand structure of free thought, which, when completed, will stand out upon the horizon of time as a towering monument to Christ and his cause.

Roman Catholicism, as taught by our modern priests and inspired by the papal power at Rome is naught but the distant rumblings of an antiquated chariot of darkness, as the teachings of this MONARCHICAL creed has naught in view but the enslavement of reason for the financial gain and benefit of the "Robed" few who claim the right to think for the masses.

For thirty long years I was bound to this bewitching spirit of darkness by the chords of superstition and never dared to look above my blind superiors for wisdom, until a "something" which I will call "fate" broke the windows of my mental dungeon and permitted the light of "SPIRITUAL LIBERTY" to filter through my being which awoke "reason and common sense" from her long sleep of lethargy.

(7) THIRTY YEARS IN HELL

Now, what I once thought "Holy" I detest as abominable; What I once worshipped, I now hate.

It is not the glitter of gold nor the applaudits of the Protestant world that I crave, but it is the Master's approval, that I desire. Therefore I deem it my duty to both God and mankind to proclaim to the world what I know of the awfulness of Roman Catholicism, and I know enough to make my poor soul often wonder if I shall ever be permitted, to sing with the blest around that GREAT WHITE THRONE in the New Jerusalem.

As you peruse these pages, I pray that you may whisper a prayer to God in my behalf, as I am now fifty-six years old and only a child in wisdom.

With pity for the blind hosts of Catholicism and a prayer upon my lips for their deliverance from the trenches of paganism, I dedicate this book to the world as coming from a heart which poured out its youth's vitality upon the barren fields of superstition, and wasted its vigor in serving only the god of myths. With a feeling of brotherly love for the entire world, I am,

Yours in His name,

BERNARD FRESENBORG.



kspletzer
#1555 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:08:03 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 3/25/2007
Posts: 2,635
Location: Heaven Bound
LIST OF CATHOLIC HERESIES
And HUMAN TRADITIONS
ADOPTED and PERPETUATED by the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
IN THE COURSE OF 1600 YEARS
(Compiled by Rev. Stephen L. Testa)

"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall
make you free." —Jesus in John 8:32

Notice:--These dates are in many cases approximate. Many of these heresies had been current in the Church years before, but only when they were officially adopted by a Church council and proclaimed by the pope as dogma of faith, did they become binding on Catholics.

And doctrine to be true must conform to the Word of God. "To the law and to the testimony; if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." (Isaiah 8:20)

At the Reformation in the 16th Century these heresies were repudiated as having no part in the Religion of Jesus as taught in the New Testament.

Heresy Date

OF ALL THE HUMAN TRADITIONS taught and practiced by the Roman Catholic Church, which are contrary to the Bible, the most ancient are the prayers for the dead and the sign of the Cross. Both began 300 years after Christ. 310
Wax Candles introduced in church. about 320
Veneration of angels and dead saints. 375
The Mass, as a daily celebration, adopted. 394
The worship of Mary, the mother of Jesus, and the use of the term, "Mother of God", as applied to her, originated in the Council of Ephesus 431
Priests began to dress differently from the laity 500
Extreme Unction 526
The doctrine of Purgatory was first established by Gregory the Great 593
The Latin language, as the language of prayer and worship in churches, was also imposed by Pope Gregory I. 600 years after Christ

The Word of God forbids praying and teaching in an unknown tongue. (1st Corinthians 14:9). 600
The Bible teaches that we pray to God alone. In the primitive church never were prayers directed to Mary, or to dead saints. This practice began in the Roman Church

(Matthew 11:28; Luke 1:46; Acts 10:25-26; 14:14-18) 600
The Papacy is of pagan origin. The title of pope or universal bishop, was first given to the bishop of Rome by the wicked emperor Phocas

This he did to spite Bishop Ciriacus of Constantinople, who had justly excommunicated him for his having caused the assassination of his predecessor emperor Mauritius. Gregory 1, then bishop of Rome, refused the title, but his successor, Boniface III, first assumed title "pope."

Jesus did not appoint Peter to the headship of the apostles and forbade any such notion. (Luke 22:24-26; Ephesians 1:22-23; Colossians 1:18; 1st Corinthians 3:11).

Note: Nor is there any mention in Scripture, nor in history, that Peter ever was in Rome, much less that he was pope there for 25 years; Clement, 3rd bishop of Rome, remarks that "there is no real 1st century evidence that Peter ever was in Rome." 610
The kissing of the Pope's feet

It had been a pagan custom to kiss the feet of emperors. The Word of God forbids such practices. (Read Acts 10:25-26; Revelation 19:10; 22:9). 709
The Temporal power of the Popes

When Pepin, the usurper of the throne of France, descended into Italy, called by Pope Stephen II, to war against the Italian Lombards, he defeated them and gave the city of Rome and surrounding territory to the pope. Jesus expressly forbade such a thing, and He himself refused worldly kingship. (Read Matthew 4:8-9; 20:25-26; John 18:38). 750
Worship of the cross, images and relics was authorized

This was by order of Dowager Empress Irene of Constantinople, who first caused to pluck the eyes of her own son, Constantine VI, and then called a church council at the request of Hadrian I, pope of Rome at that time.

Such practice is called simply IDOLATRY in the Bible, and is severely condemned. (Read Exodus 20:4; 3:17; Deuteronomy 27:15; Psalm 115). 788
Holy Water, mixed with a pinch of salt and blessed by the priest, was authorized 850
The veneration of St. Joseph began 890
The baptism of bells was instituted by Pope John XIV 965
Canonization of dead saints, first by Pope John XV

Every believer and follower of Christ is called saint in the Bible. (Read Romans 1:7; 1st Colossians 1:2). 995
Fasting on Fridays and during Lent were imposed

Imposed by popes said to be interested in the commerce of fish. (Bull, or permit to eat meat), some authorities say, began in the year 700. This is against the plain teaching of the Bible. (Read Matthew 15:10; 1st Corinthians 10:25; 1st Timothy 4:1-3). 998
The Mass was developed gradually as a sacrifice; attendance made obligatory in the 11th century.

The Bible teaches that the sacrifice of Christ was offered once and for all, and is not to be repeated, but only commemorated in the Lord's Supper. (Read Hebrews 7:27; 9:26-28; 10:10-14).
The celibacy of the priesthood was decreed by Pope Hildebrand, Boniface VII

Jesus imposed no such rule, nor did any of the apostles. On the contrary, St. Peter was a married man, and St. Paul says that bishops were to have wife and children. (Read 1st Timothy 3:2,5, and 12; Matthew 8:14-15). 1079
The Rosary, or prayer beads was introduced by Peter the Hermit, in the year 1090. Copied from Hindus and Mohammedans

The counting of prayers is a pagan practice and is expressly condemned by Christ. (Matthew 6:5-13). 1090
The Inquisition of heretics was instituted by the Council of Verona in the year 1184. Jesus never taught the use of force to spread His religion 1184
The sale of Indulgences, commonly regarded as a purchase of forgiveness and a permit to indulge in sin.

Christianity, as taught in the Bible, condemns such a traffic and it was the protest against this traffic that brought on the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century. 1190
The dogma of Transubstantiation was decreed by Pope Innocent III, in the year

By this doctrine the priest pretends to perform a daily miracle by changing a wafer into the body of Christ, and then he pretends to eat Him alive in the presence of his people during Mass. The Bible condemns such absurdities; for the Lord's Supper is simply a memorial of the sacrifice of Christ. The spiritual presence of Christ is implied in the Lord's Supper. (Read Luke 22:19-20; John 6:35; 1st Corinthians 11:26). 1215
Confession of sin to the priest at least once a year was instituted by Pope Innocent III., in the Lateran Council

The Bible commands us to confess our sins direct to God. (Read Psalm 51:1-10; Luke 7:48; 15:21; 1st John 1:8-9). 1215
The adoration of the wafer (Host), was decreed by Pope Honorius

So the Roman Church worships a God made by human hands. This is plain idolatry and absolutely contrary to the spirit of the Gospel. (Read John 4:24). 1220
The Bible forbidden to laymen and placed in the Index of forbidden books by the Council of Valencia

Jesus commanded that the Scriptures should be read by all. (John 5:39; 1st Timothy 3:15-17). 1229
The Scapular was invented by Simon Stock, and English monk

It is a piece of brown cloth, with the picture of the Virgin and supposed to contain supernatural virtue to protect from all dangers those who wear it on naked skin. This is fetishism. 1287
The Roman Church forbade the cup to the laity, by instituting the communion of one kind in the Council of Constance

The Bible commands us to celebrate the Lord's Supper with unleavened bread and the fruit of the vine. (Read Matthew 26:27; 1st Corinthians 11:26-29). 1414
The doctrine of Purgatory was proclaimed as a dogma of faith by Council of Florence

There is not one word in the Bible that would teach the purgatory of priests. The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sins. (Read 1st John 1:7-9; 2:1-2; John 5:24; Romans 8:1). 1439
The doctrine of 7 Sacraments affirmed

The Bible says that Christ instituted only two ordinances, Baptism and the Lord's Supper. (Read Matthew 28:19-20; 26:26-28). 1439
The Ave Maria, part of the last

It was completed 50 years afterward and finally approved by Pope Sixtus V, at the end of the 16th century. 1508
The Council of Trent, held in the year 1545, declared that Tradition is of equal authority with the Bible

By tradition is meant human teachings. The Pharisees believed the same way, and Jesus bitterly condemned them, for by teaching human tradition, they nullified the commandments of God. (Read Mark 7:7-13; Colossians 2:8; Revelation 22:18). 1545
The apocryphal books were added to the Bible also by the Council of Trent

These books were not recognized as canonical by the Jewish Church. (See Revelation 22:8-9). 1546
The Creed of Pope Pius IV was imposed as the official creed 1560 years after Christ and the apostles

True Christians retain the Holy Scriptures as their creed. Hence their creed is 1500 years older than the creed of Roman Catholics. (Read Galatians 1:8). 1560
The Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary was proclaimed by Pope Pius IX

The Bible states that all men, with the sole exception of Christ, are sinners. Mary herself had need of a Savior. (Read Romans 3:23; 5:12; Psalm 51:5; Luke 1:30,46,47). 1834
In the year 1870 after Christ, Pope Pius IX proclaimed the dogma of Papal Infallibility

This is a blasphemy and the sign of the apostasy and of the antichrist predicted by St. Paul. (Read 2nd Thessalonians 2:2-12; Revelation 17:1-9; 13:5music,18).

Many Bible students see the number of the beast (Rev. 13:18), 666 in the Roman letters of the Pope's title: "VICARIVS FILII DEI." -- V-5, I-1; C-100, I-1; V-S, I-1; L-50, I-1; I-1; D-500, I-l — Total, 666. 1870
Pope Plus X, in the year 1907, condemned together with "Modernism", all the discoveries of modern science which are not approved by the Church

Pius IX had done the same thing in the Syllabus of 1864. 1907
In the year 1930 Pius XI, condemned the Public Schools 1930
In the year 1931 the same pope Pius XI, reaffirmed the doctrine that Mary is "the Mother of God"

This doctrine was first invented by the Council of Ephesus in the year 431. This is a heresy contrary by Mary's own words. (Read Luke 1:46-49; John 2: l-5). 1931
In the year 1950 the last dogma was proclaimed by Pope Pius XII, the Assumption of the Virgin Mary 1950


CONCLUSION

What will be the next invention? The Roman Church says it never changes; yet, it has done nothing else but invent new doctrines which are contrary to the Bible, and has practiced rites and ceremonies taken bodily from paganism. Some scholar has found that 75% of the rites and ceremonies of the Roman Church are of pagan origin.

Note:-- Cardinal Newman, in his book, "The Development of the Christian Religion," admits that ... "Temples, incense, oil lamps, votive offerings, holy water, holidays and season of devotions, processions, blessing of fields, sacerdotal vestments, the tonsure (of priests and monks and nuns), images ... are all of pagan origin..." (Page 359).

HERESIES are those doctrines and practices which are contrary to the Bible. They are also called "human traditions" or "doctrines of men". Both Peter and Paul predicted and warned that in the later times "false teachers" would rise within the Church and bring in "damnable heresies" and "doctrines of devils". (Read 2nd Peter 2:1-3, and 1st Timothy 3:2-5). Jesus rebuked the Pharisees, for they transgressed the commandments of God by keeping their traditions. "in vain," He said, "they worship me by keeping for doctrines the commandments of men" (Matthew 15:3,9).

The real heretics therefore, are the Roman Catholics and the true orthodox are the Evangelical Christians.

BRETHREN! The Word of God commands us to get out of Babylon, saying: "Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." (Revelation 18:4). All true Christians will remain faithful to the religion of Christ as taught in the Bible, and heed the warning of the Apostle Paul, who said: "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other Gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." (Galatians 1:8).




kspletzer
#1556 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:00:01 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 3/25/2007
Posts: 2,635
Location: Heaven Bound
A Christian who does not experience persecution is a Christian who is not living for God. The wicked world hates Jesus Christ and anyone who reminds them of Christ. If men found fault in Jesus to crucify Him, Who was perfect in every way, then what shall they do unto imperfect Christians?

"Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution." —2nd Timothy 3:12

The truth needs to be known. I love you in the Lord whoever you may be, and I ask for your forgiveness if I seem unkind or presumptuous, for I am genuinely concerned and very sincere in wanting to help others.

IICorinth. 11:1-- "Would to God ye could bear with me a little in my folly; and indeed bear with me."

Gal. 4:16-- "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?"

Ezek. 33:8-- "When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man,thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity, but thou hast delivered thy soul."

Roman 4:3-5-- "For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justified the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness."

Isaiah 53:3-- "He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief; and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not."

John 15:19-- " If ye were of the world, the world would love his own; but because ye are NOT OF THIS WORLD, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you."

A Christian who does not experience persecution is a Christian who is not living for God. The wicked world hates Jesus Christ and anyone who reminds them of Christ. If men found fault in Jesus to crucify Him, Who was perfect in every way, then what shall they do unto imperfect Christians?



kspletzer
#1557 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:40:06 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 3/25/2007
Posts: 2,635
Location: Heaven Bound
Did the Roman Catholic church give us our Bible?
Roman Catholics often say that it was their church that gave us the Bible. They sometimes claim this when defending their "Sacred Tradition" so that they might support extra-biblical teachings such as purgatory, penance, indulgences, and Mary worship. They often say the only way the Christian church knew what books are to be included in the Canon of Scripture was because it was revealed by word-of-mouth in the early church; that is, by the tradition of the Catholic Church.

Unfortunately, this argument implies that tradition is superior to Scripture. Of course, we are not saying that the Roman Catholic church teaches that tradition is above Scripture. But when Sacred Tradition is claimed to be the thing by which Scripture is given, then tradition is inadvertently the thing that gives blessing and approval to the Bible. Heb. 7:7 says, "But without any dispute the lesser is blessed by the greater." The unfortunate psychological effect of saying that Roman Catholic tradition is what gave us the Bible, is that it elevates their tradition to a level far greater than what is permitted in Scripture. In fact, it is contradicted by scripture:

"Now these things, brethren, I have figuratively applied to myself and Apollos for your sakes, that in us you might learn not to exceed what is written, in order that no one of you might become arrogant in behalf of one against the other," (1 Cor. 4:6).
The Bible tells us to obey the Word of God, to not go beyond the written Word, so that we might not make mistakes in what is true. Unfortunately, the problem with an elevated status of Roman Catholic church tradition is that it results in various justifications of it's non-biblical teachings such as prayer to Mary, purgatory, indulgences, penance, works of righteousness, etc. Because it has deviated from trusting God's Word alone, it has ventured into unscriptural areas. Nevertheless, did the Roman Catholic Church give us the Bible? No, it did not.

First of all, the Roman Catholic Church was not really in effect as an organization in the first couple hundred years of the Christian Church. The Christian church was under persecution and official church gatherings were risky business in the Roman Empire. Catholicism as an organization with a central figure located in Rome did not occur for quite some time, in spite of its claim they can trace the papacy back to Peter.

Second, the Christian Church recognized what was Scripture. It did not establish it. This is a very important point. The Christian Church recognizes what God has inspired and pronounces that recognition. In other words, it discovers what is already authentic. Jesus said "my sheep hear my voice and they follow me..." (John 10:27). The church hears the voice of Christ; that is, it recognizes what is inspired and it follows the word. It does not add to it as the Roman Catholic Church has done. Therefore, it is not following the voice of Christ.

Third, the Roman Catholic Church did not give us the Old Testament which is the Scripture to which Christ and the apostles appealed. If the Roman Catholic Church wants to state that it gave us the Bible, how can they claim to have given us the Old Testament which is part of the Bible? It didn't, so it cannot make that claim. The fact is that the followers of God, the true followers of God, recognize what is and is not inspired. The Jews knew what was inspired of God and they recognized what God had inspired. That is what those who are of God do.

Fourth, when the apostles wrote the New Testament documents they were inspired by the power of the Holy Spirit. There wasn't any real issue of whether or not they were authentic. Their writings did not need to be deemed worthy of inclusion in the Canon of Scripture by a later group of men in the so-called Roman Catholic Church. To make such a claim is, in effect, to usurp the natural power and authority of God himself.

Fifth, the Scripture says, "But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, 21 for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God," (2 Pet. 1:20-21). The Bible tells us that the Scriptures are inspired by the Holy Spirit. Therefore, the very nature of the inspired documents is that they carry power and authenticity in themselves. They are not given the power or the authenticity of ecclesiastical declaration.

Conclusion
The Christian church merely recognizes the Word of God (John 10:27). The authenticity of the New Testament documents rests in the inspiration of God through the apostles. It does not rest in the declaration of the Catholic Church. This is very important. The Christian Church recognizes what God has ordained through his sovereign inspiration to be the word of God. When the Catholic Church claims that it is the source of the sacred Scriptures, it is, in effect, placing itself above the word of God. It needs to repent.

From Carm--Christian Apologitics and Reaserach Ministry.
fishnet
#1558 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:13:28 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 9/27/2009
Posts: 4,676
KS....the Catholic church does not claim to be the source of the bible, but the books of the New Testament were gathered together by the Universal church. Those that are in the new testament were selected among many. Catholic means universal.
Mwalacavage
#1559 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 7:31:55 PM

Rank: King




Joined: 11/16/2008
Posts: 1,660
The Ethiopian and Syriac Oriental Orthodox Churches would claim (a claim I would have a hard time disputing) that they collected their Bibles without needing the guidance of later Roman councils.
cfirebird65
#1560 Posted : Thursday, November 19, 2009 7:32:59 PM

Rank: King




Joined: 10/7/2009
Posts: 2,051
[quote=kspletzer]
4. THE FALLACY OF INDIFFERENCE?
Christ died for all
Yes, we all know that – and we didn't have to pay big bucks to Faith Bible College to teach us that.

Now for the sake of everyone else reading your post, try to appear educated and literate in your posts, instead of mixing up what I said with your Baptist salad. Separate what you clipped and pasted from my posts on the True Church, from your babble.

Until you can do so, I am not wasting time with the rest of your rantings - no need to give you so much attention, when the focus should be on Christ and ALL HIS TEACHINGS - not your opinions and your feelings.

Meanwhile, I challenge you to prove from Scripture and ancient writings that your church of believers - that is, those that came from the reformation - is the true one that Christ established. I am not interested in your fanciful theories. I am looking for the truth and you haven’t been able to give it. If you can only give the usual red herrings like dajcat, I will hold you tootsies to the fire with a continuing challenge to prove what you say. It is just part of the medicine I gave you when you tried to argue that anti-Catholics like you don't hate. After I taught you how to use a dictionary and thesaurus to check out what HATE meant, I haven't heard a squeak from you. Try to show us all that you know about early Christian history which involves the establishment of the ONE CHURCH of Christ, or admit you flunked history in school and like to tell fairy stories.




"What we do in life echoes in eternity." - Maximus
156 Pages «<7677787980>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

YAF_Copper Theme Modified from a Jaben Cargman theme (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 3.174 seconds.