yep you guys have no soul, and you claim you are Christians. I don't think so as you sure don't follow the teachings of Jesus Christ who cared for the sick and dying and didn't gouged them will outrageous bills.

I might add that we on the left do search for truth and facts, we don't stop with fnc as you do.

And he didn't charge them either now did he? Still shows how little you understand what it is to be a true Christian.

And one last thing – just so you know - the Democrat congressional leaders agreed to fold Obama’s student-loan proposal into a bill aimed at winning final approval of his drive to overhaul U.S. healthcare. Now what the hell student loans have to do with healthcare is beyond me – meanwhile the quarter trillion dollar Doc Fix is left out of the healthcare bill to keep the CBO’s numbers down to fudge the numbers once again.

So why is there a student loan reader in the healthcare bill — I know you are wondering – it’s an entitlement for “underrepresented minorities” going to medical school now what’s a “underrepresented minorities” well I can tell you it’s not Asians and it’s not Jews so you do the math on that. Frankly, I thought being “underrepresented” is what made you a minority in the first damn place

Within the last three months, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has twice sent letters to the president and the leaders of the House and Senate warning them of discriminatory provisions in both bills. But those warnings have been ignored, and the problems remain.

Take Reid's bill. It directs the secretary of health and human services to award federal grants worth billions of dollars to educational institutions that train medical-service providers. However, "priority" for federal dollars is to be given only to those institutions offering "preferential" admissions to underrepresented minorities (according to race, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, and religion, depending on which section of the bill you look at). Thus, schools will be unable to compete for essential federal funding unless they adopt admission policies that intentionally and deliberately discriminate. It guarantees the institution of racist and sexist quotas sanctioned and encouraged by the federal government in what Linda Chavez of the Center for Equal Opportunity correctly calls "a new racial spoils system."

The bill also declares that institutions training social workers, psychologists, psychiatrists, behavioral pediatricians, psychiatric nurses, and counselors will be ineligible for federal grants unless they discriminate. According to Section 756, these programs must enroll "individuals and groups from different racial, ethnic, cultural, geographic, religious, linguistic, and class backgrounds, and different genders and sexual orientations" and demonstrate "knowledge and understanding of the concerns of the[se] individuals and groups." If the schools fail to abide by these requirements, they will be liable for "liquidated damages."

The Senate bill even creates a federally funded and administered medical school called the United States Public Health Services Track to "grant appropriate advanced degrees." Priority in admissions is to be given to "students from rural communities and underrepresented minorities." ("Underrepresented minorities" is liberal code for "Asians need not apply.
Naturally, other sections of the bill require lots of data collection regarding race, ethnicity, sex, and so on. Those data will be used to implement quotas of all kinds and put providers at risk of being sued. For example, the data will help trial lawyers pursue "disparate impact" cases against physicians and hospitals -- even if the differing health outcomes of patients have nothing to do with actual discriminatory treatment by providers. One provision even requires the secretary of health and human services to consult with "representatives of racial and ethnic minorities" about the content of promotional labels or print ads for drugs. Racial politics is poised to trump scientific accuracy in drug labeling.

In general, the bill reflects two articles of faith prevalent on the left: (1) that discrimination is perfectly acceptable when practiced in favor of certain minority groups; and (2) that racial disparities in health outcomes arise because doctors and patients don't have the same racial or ethnic or cultural background. The latter is, of course, nonsense. As the Civil Rights Commission said succinctly, the assumption that "racial health disparities are caused by a shortage of medical professionals of particular races misdiagnose[s] the problem and may well exacerbate it." CLICK

now that is a bit frightening. not the best and brightest but simply "quota".

wonder what they'll do with all the monies saved up during the four (6?) years to implement this thing?

If your going to correct others cowboy, at least be right. In this case it means percentage of doctors vs. perctage of population. Example: If American Indians were 1% of doctors and 2% of population they would be "underrepresented".