Home  •  Forum  •  Blogs  •  E-Mail  •  Support Categories
MyCopper Categories Finance Travel Real Estate Games Autos Entertainment
Welcome Guest Active Topics |

Information on Medicare's Payments to Physicians and the Budgetary Effects of H.R. 3961, the Medicar Options
lyris
#1 Posted : Friday, November 20, 2009 2:29:12 AM

Rank: King




Joined: 8/16/2003
Posts: 2,175
Information on Medicare's Payments to Physicians and the Budgetary Effects of H.R. 3961, the Medicare Physicians Payment Reform Act of 2009

Changes in Medicare’s Payments to Physicians

CBO just released a letter responding to questions from Congressman Ryan about H.R. 3961, the Medicare Physicians Payment Reform Act of 2009, which is scheduled to be considered by the House of Representatives today. Congressman Ryan inquired about the total budgetary impact of enacting that bill, which would increase the rates Medicare pays to physicians, along with H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, the broad health care reform bill passed by the House of Representatives a few weeks ago.

H.R. 3961 would change payment rates and restructure the sustainable growth rate (SGR), the formula that determines the updates to payment rates for fee-for-service physicians’ services in Medicare. Under current law, those payment rates are scheduled to be reduced by about 21 percent in January 2010, and CBO estimates that the rates will be reduced by about 2 percent annually for several subsequent years. H.R. 3961 would increase those payment rates by 1.2 percent in 2010 and implement a new formula beginning in 2011. Those changes would result in significantly higher payment rates for physicians than those that would result under current law.

CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 3961, by itself, would cost $210 billion over the 2010–2019 period. CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation have separately estimated that enacting H.R. 3962 would reduce federal budget deficits by $109 billion over that same period.

CBO estimates that enacting both bills would add $89 billion to budget deficits over the 2010–2019 period, somewhat less than the sum of the effects of enacting the bills separately because of interactions between their provisions. The agency estimates that the two bills together would increase the budget deficit in 2019 by $23 billion relative to current law, an increment that would grow in subsequent years.

A detailed year-by-year projection for the following decade, like those that CBO prepares for the 10-year budget window, would not be meaningful because the uncertainties involved are simply too great. CBO has therefore developed a rough outlook for that decade. As stated in its October 29, 2009, letter to Congressman Charles B. Rangel, “CBO expects that [H.R. 3962] would slightly reduce federal budget deficits in that decade relative to those projected under current law—with a total effect during that decade that is in a broad range between zero and one-quarter percent of GDP [gross domestic product].” If both H.R. 3961 and H.R. 3962 were enacted, CBO expects that federal budget deficits during the decade following the 10-year budget window would increase relative to those projected under current law—with a total effect during that decade that is in a broad range between zero and one-quarter percent of GDP.
Republicans are Really Free Loader Advocates of Something for Nothing When It Comes to Cutting Taxes

....The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then get elected and prove it.--P.J. O'ROURKE, Holidays in Hell

Remember.......Just going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in your garage makes you a car..

gop creed: Love the fetus hate the child

If the gop were a car it would only have one gear: Reverse

"Unless your business model depends on bilking people, there is little to fear from these new rules." President Obama 2010

Funny how the conservative reverence for the country's founding fathers so often stops just short of defending the principles these men stood for.
Sponsor  
 
lin22874
#2 Posted : Friday, November 20, 2009 10:41:39 PM

Rank: King


Joined: 7/1/2008
Posts: 18,132
So how does this restructure of physicians fees going to reduce the operational cost of Medicare?
lin22874
#3 Posted : Saturday, November 21, 2009 12:26:03 AM

Rank: King


Joined: 7/1/2008
Posts: 18,132
Read on Majority Leader's website that PayGo legislation was attached to this bill. This is return to pay as you go legislation which was thrown out during Bush years. Democrats are trying to put it back on books--it's a proven winner.
lin22874
#4 Posted : Saturday, November 21, 2009 12:41:10 AM

Rank: King


Joined: 7/1/2008
Posts: 18,132
"PAYGO ESSENTIAL TO ACHIEVING PROGRESSIVE ISSUES--Democrats Work to Restore Fiscal Discipline, Enact PAYGO into Law

There is a common misconception that fiscal discipline is only a conservative position. In fact, PAYGO has long been supported by progressive members of Congress. They are well-represented among the more than 160 House Democrats who already co-sponsored and voted in favor of the legislation. In the 1990s, the Clinton Administration turned deficits into record surpluses due in large part to adhering to PAYGO. However, under President Bush and Congressional Republicans, PAYGO was waived and allowed to expire so that they could pass debt-financed tax cuts for the wealthy that wiped out those surpluses. Democrats understand that paying for what we buy is crucial not only to roll back deficits, but to achieve additional progressive goals for all Americans.

Why Is PAYGO Important For Progressives?
Investments that matter most to progressives – clean energy technology, affordable higher education, and health care access – require a long-term commitment. None of them are one-time payments. Unfortunately, deep deficits threaten to crowd out spending on those issues that progressives value. And when spending cuts have to happen, it’s the most vulnerable Americans who are hurt. By practicing fiscal discipline today, we will ensure that we can afford to pay for our most important priorities in the future.

“Without changes in current policies, we face the prospect of rapidly growing federal deficits and debt over time that will pose a significant threat to the U.S. economy, to the standard of living of all Americans, and to the ability of the government to meet the needs of its citizens.”–- Bob Greenstein, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 6/18/09

Additionally, the interests of progressives will be well served by enacting PAYGO into law:
•PAYGO would apply to new entitlement and tax cuts but not to discretionary programs that are funded through the annual appropriations process and are subject to caps set out in the budget, such as funding for elementary and secondary education, Head Start, health research, environmental protection, and basic government functions.

•Mandatory programs that assist low-income Americans are also exempt from sequestration, such as Medicaid, Social Security, the Children's Health Insurance Program, and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families.

•Should Republicans come back into power, PAYGO would help prevent the reckless debt-financed tax cuts for the wealthy that were put in place under President Bush. Passage of those tax cuts was made possible by waiving PAYGO. With a PAYGO law in place, advocates of tax cuts would have to acknowledge the costs and show which popular programs they would cut to pay for them."

Prepared by the Office of Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, 11/18/09
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

YAF_Copper Theme Modified from a Jaben Cargman theme (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.290 seconds.