ISP Information:
This is a means of managing data in a relational database. There is a SQL standard, and there are also many vendor-specific SQL packages which combine relational databases with tools SQL tools to manage them. Statements in SQL can be used to read or request data from a database, such as, "select * from geek," which would return an entire table of data from the table named "geek." Queries can also be much more complex suc - Joseph wrote: Then again it may make a difference *how* valuable the old customer was. Do they do over $100 a month in charges or are they a $20 a month customer. That may make a difference.This selectivity based on the "value of the customer" goes both ways.After a bad experience with AT&T (who changed my contract terms innasty ways, raised the price, and insisted on an annual contract forcontinued service) I cancelled my cellular service with them.I'm looking for a cell provider that offers all or most of these:- Low or no per-month charges (say $10 or less); the providershould make most of its money from a high per-minute rate instead.(I had the phone for a few, important calls, and never used as muchas one tenth of the 2000 minutes/month that I had to pay for as partof AT&T's plan);- No insistence that I accept services I don't want (paging, textmessaging, video, or Custom Calling type features);- Per-line caller-ID blocking and a promise that the number won'tbe included in cellular directories or sold to marketers;- No commitment longer than 90 days (especially if the provider isunwilling to commit in return that its plan and rates won't change);I have no problem with paying for the phone up front; and- No locking the phone so that I can't use it with multipleproviders. (AT&T's is a pain to use in many locations because theyprogram the handset so it will always insist on using an AT&T celltower if it detects one, even if the signal is really horrible and abetter signal is available from another provider.)I would like to see a good comparison site for cellular servicessimilar to abelltolls.com for long distance services.
One of the main components of most monitors and TVs. A beam of electrons is shot towards the CRT, and as the electrons collide with phosphors on the inside surface they produce light. Today, other technologies are performing better than the heavy and bulky tube monitors. LCD panels, gas plasma panels, and projection units are all in contention, but they still can't compare to the low cost of a CRT monitor or TV. - Unable to hold it back any longer, Nomen Nescio Postedthe following to alt.consumers.free-stuff: Todd Behrmann (Just Plain Insane): Have you ever done a Google search on your own name? You're all over the internet, d00d! lol You participate in all sorts of sci-fi forums and troll many newsgroups. You write all sorts of "letters to the editors" of websites. You waste so much time just wanting attention and wanting people to know your opinions that your REAL life has suffered to the point of failure! You truly are one insecure loser! *LMAO!!! Now for your real picture so people understand what we mean (courtesy of Ron): http://acfsliars.0catch.com/todd The below OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT AND NEWSPAPER LINKS show that your life has been falling apart for years and yet you continue to place playing on the internet at the top of your priorities, even to the point of letting it cause two marriages to fail and even your parents getting fed up enough to sue you. Now you're unemployed, bankrupt, and on food stamps. AND YOU STILL PLACE PLAYING ON THE INTERNET ABOVE FINDING A JOB SO YOU ARE NOW ON WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS, YOU PARASITE TO SOCIETY! You truly deserved to lose custody of your daughter to your ex-wife Kandie! You can't even support YOURSELF, much less provide a stable environment for a wife and child! *LMAO See Todd Behrmann's (JPI) bankruptcy here: http://www.wisinfo.com/thereporter/news/archive/rec_10545849.shtml He is the fifth person down the list. For Todd's legal issues, go here: http://wcca.wicourts.gov/index.xsl click on "I agree" at bottom of page. It will take you to a search page. Type in Behrmann , Todd and click "search". Todd Behrmann (Just Plain Insane) unemployed and on food stamps. Scroll down to the letter from "a satisfied customer". Satisfied to be mooching off the taxpayers, that is! NOTE: "FSET" stands for Food Stamp Employment and Training. http://www.dwd.state.wi.us/dws/bjs/jsnewsletter/August03/default.htm The Source ---------- Todd Behrmann (Just Plain Insane) Newsgroup Troll King, Real Life Insecure Loser & Parasite to SocietyAgain, look at the sig above!This person wants you to trust them, yet they don't know what a "sig file"is.Is it spam?Google:http://www.dwd.state.wi.us/dws/bjs/jsnewsletter/August03/default.htmI see usenet spam :)--(��.�(�*�.� �.�*�)�.��)�.��JZ��.�(�.��(�.��* *��.�)��.�)
This is a method of scrambling DVD movie content so that DVD movies will not be played on unlicensed DVD player hardware. CSS is part of a complex group of technologies, including Macrovision and DVD Region control, developed to attempt to control the viewing and copying of DVD movies. A side effect of CSS is that no DVD movie playing software was developed for Linux, and thus the DeCSS program was created--its legality - The comments that pulver.com filed last week with the CRTC (in Canada)are posted here:http://pulver.com/reports/pulverCRTC.pdf
A processor instruction that can perform operations across multiple data instructions. So, instead of saying "Add A,B" several times to add two groups of numbers, you may say "Add Row A, Row B" or something to that effect. Instructions of this nature are often associated with 3D graphics and multimedia. - You CAN get Sony to honor a rebate, but you have to fight for it.Fight long and hard!! If you're having problems getting a responsefrom Sony, you may benefit from my experiences and you might be ableto get some results, although I did solve one problem with them, butI'm still battling another - getting the unit to work!I just got confirmation that Sony is FINALLY going to honor my $30.00rebate. I had previously posted a message a month ago describing myproblems. I wanted to document it and let anyone else having aproblem be aware of what I was experiencing as well as waiting to seehow long it would take for Sony to confirm my rebate. I was going toleave it posted and repost, if necessary, until it was resolved.Although I haven't received the rebate, yet, at least I did get anindication that it is coming. That's a big step at this point. But Istill have another problem - THE DVD BURNER I PURCHASED STILL DOESN'TWORK AND THEY CAN'T FIGURE IT OUT. IT HAS GONE THROUGH TWO LEVELS OFSUPPORT AND NOW IS IN THE HANDS OF THEIR ENGINEERS AND ONCE AGAIN ICANNOT GET THEM TO RESPOND TO MY INQUIRIES AS TO THEIR PROGRESS.So now I have to follow my own advice and keep on fighting. For thatreason, I'm now posting my current problems so that they will bedocumented and others can be aware of the progress I make - IF I makeprogress.I purchased a DVD burner that came with a $30.00 rebate. I sent inthe rebate well within the time limit, following all the directionsand received an email that I didn't include the UPC code from the box.I sent back an email with a scanned image of a photocopy of the form Isubmitted for the rebate clearly showing the UPC code that matches thedescription of the graphic they had on the form. I affixed the UPCfrom the box to the form itself. I wanted to be sure they didn't loseit.After that, I never heard from them again. I had much difficultyreaching them. Everyone I spoke to at Sony told me they were notinvolved with rebates, that it is a separate company that takes careof that. But I found when trying to communicate with this company,Sony is the only name I ever saw associated with them so I found thata little suspicious.I finally reached someone at the rebate company who asked that I refaxa copy of the paperwork I had already submitted. THEY EVEN CONFIRMEDTHEY RECEIVED MY EMAIL WITH THIS VERY INFORMATION (to which they neverresponded) but wanted me to resend it to them. It was after faxingthat information to them that they finally confirmed my rebate.Regarding the DVD burner not working, it's a DRX-510UL external unit.It cannot play DVDs and will slow down my system when it is turned on.It is the only device I have connected to my computer that does notwork.I have submitted, at Sony's request, much information regarding theunit and my computer system, including all the peripherals, driversand even all the programs I'm running on my computer. After a weekhad passed and I didn't hear from them, I attempted several times toget a status report, but I get no response from them at all. I askedfor confirmation that they are at least reading my email, but I havenot received a response at all.I paid $400.00 for this unit and at this writing, Sony cannot get theunit to work properly nor are they responding to my inquiries. Itappears to me they have abandoned me, perhaps because they cannot finda solution to the problem. That leaves me with a very expensive unitthat I cannot use and it is too late for me to return to the company(Frys Electronics) from whom I purchased the unit.So, I will continue this fight and, like my rebate situation, I'llalso document my resolution of this matter, IF it is resolved, soothers will know how to get Sony to respond and honor their ownobligation to their customers.$400.00 is a lot of money for me!!!Sony, if you are reading this, will you respond????Don
When two or more people exchange insults in a public messaging. It is sometimes done deliberately to disrupt the normal flow of messages. See troll. - By Stefanie OlsenStaff Writer, CNET News.comSightSound Technologies, a digital media company, has won a ruling inits patent case against Bertelsmann subsidiaries that could havewide-reaching effects on the business of Net music and videodownloads.Mount Lebanon, Penn.-based SightSound holds three patents related tothe sale and download of digital music and video over the Internet.In 1998, the company sued the Internet site CDNow, owned by mediatitan Bertelsmann, for infringement of patents filed in the late1980s. The case is the first and only test so far of the validity ofSightSound's intellectual property holdings.Last Thursday, a federal judge in the Western District Court ofPennsylvania and Pittsburgh granted SightSound's motion for summaryjudgment against Bertelsmann's divisions, paving the road for the5-year dispute to go to jury trial. The court also dismissedBertelsmann's request to avoid trial, which was based on the assertionthat SightSound had not filed the proper information with the UnitedStates Patent and Trademark Office.http://news.com.com/2100-1025-5101490.html
|
