ISP Information:
A group that is responsible for setting the standard for broadcast and reception of analog television signals in the United States and Japan. The original NTSC standards were set in 1953, and call for 525 horizontal lines of resolution, interlaced scanning, and a 60Hz refresh rate. That standard continues to exist until HDTV/DTV takes over. See also PAL.
ISP Glossary:
National Television Standards Committee - On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 21:52:06 EST, Len wrote: Listen why would you guys call them fraud. They have figured out a way to cut your costs, why do you care how they do it. DOES IT WORK? if it works and saves you money WHO CARES how they do it. As far as Tom and Pete I have no clue who is who.Worldcom and Enron found creative ways to save money, too. Look whereit got them.The members of this forum are, on the whole, of above-averageintelligence. Please don't try to persuade them with an argument thatsounds like it came from a nine-year-old.On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 21:52:06 EST, "Jets Guy22" wrote: Ok,so here's the deal ... it's no secret to people that when a new emerging company starts to become successful that people are going to have negative feedback about it, especially competitors. When Microsoft first emerged everyone had negative things to say about them. Why? Because people are scared of new ideas and concepts that they aren't familiar with. The company of NorVergence itself has grown exponentially and has been very thorough with their clientele in making sure they provide services in an efficient manner. Not only do they take care of their customers but they also take care of their employees unlike some other sweat-shop companies out there in the malicious corporate world especially in the telecommunications industry.Another argument worthy of a nine-year-old. Microsoft wasn't gettingmuch negative press when they "first emerged"; the negative press camelater after we all began to see what it was becoming -- you've got itexactly backward.Moderator Pat: it seems pretty obvious to me that "Len", "Jets Guy22",and at least one other poster on this topic (also with a Hotmailaddress) are actually the same person, trying single-handedly to givethe impression that there's some groundswell of support forNorvergence. It's a shady tactic being used to support a companyaccused of using shady tactics.I'd be interested to know exactly when each of these "three people"made their first posts to this forum? Were they all in this sameissue?[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I really would not have any easy orconvenient way of going through thousands of messages over a 22 yearperiod to tell you the first time any of those author/writers firstappeared in print here. If you want to know that, I suggest you goto the Telecom Archives/back issues directories (the several such)and grep the names you are interested in using a wild card for thevarious issues and volume numbers. Also use various internet searchprograms to research the names, email addresses, etc.Here is an easier project for you to work on first: Please describein succinct phrases exactly what makes Norvergence a shady operationala Enron and Worldcom. I am not saying I disagree with yourassessment, only that I would like a factual report for readers here.PAT]
|
