|
|
web hosting industry, hosting industry webhosting industry, web, web hosting industry
web hosting industry |
Your
best deal for Internet service!
$1.00 for first 3 Months!
This
deal is also good for our CopperHiSpeed premium service!
* This offer is good for new accounts only. After 3 months your account
will be billed $9.95 a month for our standard monthly plan. There are
no additional fees or contracts required to take advantage of this limited
time offer. Tell
your friends!
|
 |
If you have any questions, please call us at:
| Mention promotional code 1012005 for free support! |
888-336-3318
|
Copper.net is affiliated with these organizations that
assure the highest standards
of security, privacy,
and business practices.
|
|
ISP Information:
A computer form factor for motherboards and cases that is designed for mid-range workstations. WTX motherboards can be a maximum of 14" by 16.75", and feature support for a flexible I/O board that allows OEMs to differentiate their designs by including different I/O ports.
ISP Glossary:
WTX - In article , Monty Solomon wrote: By Jim Wagner As a new Sender ID specification for beating back spam wends its way through the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), some e-mail software vendors are not waiting around for its final approval before implementing the system that the IETF will eventually bless a specification that will be used on e-mail systems throughout the world. One of the contributors to the Sender ID specification, Microsoft (Quote, Chart), has patents pending on certain components of the Sender ID technology it has donated to the IETF's efforts. Microsoft has repeatedly said that -- even if it is granted a patent on the technology -- it would "make licenses available on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms." But the issue has some in the open source world talking. The drive in the business community to press ahead with Sender ID comes at a time when some in the open source community are claiming the licensing stipulations around Sender ID don't interoperate with the most popular open source license variant, the General Public License (define). In a post to the IETF's MARID (MTA Authorization Records in DNS) discussion list the chairman of the Apache Software Foundation (ASF), Greg Stein, called Microsoft's Royalty-Free Sender ID license agreement a barrier to any ASF project. http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3402921 > > [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: What exactly is the problem with the Open Source proponents? That *they* did not think of it first? That Microsoft may get the credit?Why not try *reading* their position paper on the subject.Even you might be able to learn something from it.Do you think there is any problem with an arrangement wherebyMicrosoft could, in, say 5 years, after "everybody" is using theprotocol, _change_ the terms for continuing use of the technology_by_those_CURRENTLY_using_it_ to "if the technology is not embedded ina MicroSoft product, you must pay $100 for each e-mail messageprocessed"? Do you have any doubt that MS _would_ do such a thing ifthey thought they could get away with it? It is really a damn shame when these intelligent men and women fight and squabble among themselves while the rest of the world has to fight with the spammers. But oh well, most of them probably never even see spam (save one or two pieces each day which slip past the myriad of filters used by their secretary to get rid of it),Congratulations PAT, you've just re-proved the definition of USENET.to wit: "Open mouth, insert foot. Echo internationally."The ASF (pache oftware oundation) is almost exclusively a*VOLUNTEER* software development community. 'Secretaries'?? You've_got_ to be kidding!If _you_ are only getting one spam message every few minutes on average,you don't know what a *real* problem is. Contemplate getting 30-50,000_per_day_ for one mailbox. A million-plus per day across all the accountson the server. and those one or two pieces which they do have to view makes them angry enough to squabble with other professionals about it, but not so angry that they would even consider for a minute getting off their own high horses in order to wade through the sewer that the net has become with the rest of us.Rant, based on delusions that are *not* supported by any actual facts. Do most of those people even realize how tragic and awful the problem of spam has become? I don't think so, otherwise they surely would not be blocking the restoration efforts as much as they do, would they?Nah, I'm *sure* they don't. That's why 'spamassassin' is one of the'*FREE* for everyone' projects under the ASF umbrella.You _have_ heard of spamassassin, haven't you?In message Fred Goldstein wrote: Another interesting study, from CipherTrust, has just shown that the primary users of Sender Policy Framework are (drumroll, please) -- Spammers! Yes, it's trivial for a spammer to pass
|
|
