|
|
 Rank: Queen  Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
Runbeck Election Services has much of Maricopa’s election data, before it gets manipulated by Maricopa election officials. Runbeck knows exactly how many were on the qualified voter file (QVF) given to them by Maricopa. Runbeck knows how many ballots they printed, how many were mailed, to who, and when. They know exactly how many completed ballot envelopes were returned to their Phoenix headquarters. And if these came from USPS, or from polling places. They know how many completed ballot envelopes they scanned for signatures, and how many are left to scan. They possess the hi-res envelope signature images for EVERY Maricopa mail-in ballot.
Maricopa has still not provided all chain of custody documents from Runbeck and USPS for the 2020 election. When Cyber Ninja’s conducted their 2021 Maricopa audit, AZ Senate President Karan Fann would not permit Doug Logan to subpoena Runbeck for signature images, or any other information. In fact, Fann purposely blocked anyone from even talking with Runbeck. Runbeck has been shielded from every investigation involving Maricopa election fraud. Even Arizona AG Brnovich refused to interview staff at Runbeck.
Concerned campaigns and election investigations should target Runbeck for data. Runbeck plays a critical role in Maricopa elections, but are never held accountable to the public. With this much control over Maricopa elections, Runbeck must be forced to open their books and become transparent?
Behind Closed Doors: More on Runbeck Election Services in Maricopa County and the Scanning of Ballot Envelopes
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
  
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
Throughout the election cycle, Uplift posted the latest updates on mail-in ballot counts on its website as ballots arrived in the weeks leading up to Election Day. This was a great tool for Democrats to understand the real-time results. On Election Day Uplift tracked the hourly reported results from precincts across Maricopa County.
When the polls closed at 8:00 PM MT Uplift released its final analysis from the day.
Maricopa County turnout numbers on Election Day at 8:00 PM:
Republicans received 52.7% of the vote.
“Other” received 30.7% of the vote.
Democrats received 16.6% of the vote.
Kari Lake won 51.8% of the 85,000 Maricopa ballots on Saturday night.
On Sunday, Kari Lake won 54% of the 97,000 Maricopa ballots on Sunday night.
Maricopa County election officials want you to believe that ALL of the independent voters on election day voted Democrat in Maricopa County.
Maricopa County election officials want you to believe that Democrats had 16.6% of the vote on Election Day and this translated into over 50% of the vote as these votes were counted since Election Day.
IMPOSSIBLE: Despite Only 17% Democrat Turnout on Election Day – Katie Hobbs and Democrats Are Winning Over 50% of Maricopa County Election Day Totals
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
We’ve got something for you if you’re looking for irregularities in your local elections.
Columbia, New Hampshire. It’s way up north. A tiny little town that, according to the 2020 US Census, had 695 residents.
But according to the Secretary of State, Maggie Hassan received 1,106 votes from the same town.
Don Bolduc had 193 votes.
The State Website reports Columbia, NH, had 735 residents in 2019. Columbia, NH’s website says the population in 2010 was 798. Wikipedia cites a decline based on the 2020 census to 695.
How were over 1300 votes cast in a town with a population under 700 at least and under 800 at best?
Someone up there might want to request the same-day registration list. Your town doubled in size overnight.
Another Democrat Miracle! Maggie Hassan Wins 1,100 Votes from Town with Population Under 700
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
Americans who remain skeptical about the integrity of our modern elections are not a ‘threat to democracy.’ They are defenders of the republic.
As we witness the mass breakdown of voting machines on the single day of the year they’re supposed to work, cameras going down in vote-counting offices, and the endless drip-drip of ballot dumps — curiously in the most hotly-contested races and most critical precincts for political control in the country — remember that this is all commonplace and normal. And if you think otherwise, you’re not only unhinged, but you might be a domestic terrorist.
This is the gaslighting we have been getting from our political class and the media over the last two federal election cycles. It is purposeful propaganda meant to obscure the truth that our betters have fundamentally transformed voting policies and practices, and then exploited the new rules to the maximum extent.
The reality is that those skeptical about the integrity in our brave new election world are not a “threat to democracy.” They are defenders of the republic.
America is in serious danger if the public unquestioningly accepts the fact that authorities made radical changes, sometimes unduly and under cover of crisis, that made less safe, secure, or at minimum trustworthy the processes by which we elect our representatives.
Many states made permanent the temporary election practices of 2020, loosening their voting rules, with tens of millions of voters continuing to vote by mail. In the days before the election, we were told by the likes of Politico that the very vulnerabilities in election infrastructure feared by supposed conspiracy theorists and election denialists in 2020 in fact were present in 2022.
Problems cropped up in voting centers on Election Day when and where Republicans vote disproportionately. From Maricopa County, Arizona, to Mercer County, New Jersey, electronic tabulation machines malfunctioned en masse. That is, machines with literally one job, on the one day they’re supposed to work, didn’t.
The RNC alleged voter disenfranchisement as a consequence of the Maricopa debacle, but a judge dismissed the case.
In Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, 44 polling locations reportedly ran out of paper to print ballots. Ballot machines went down in Harris County, Texas. In Suffolk County, New York the tabulation process was reportedly “impacted” by government computers that had been hacked months ago. Chesterfield County, Virginia had a whole host of issues – apparently manual and electronic.
And then there’s the fact that Arizona, in part because of Maricopa County, and Nevada, with pivotal races for the U.S. Senate and governor, as of this writing have not reported their final results. Officials in both states claim the count may take days.
What is clear is that they are effectively normalizing the abnormal with each cycle that passes. We are the last safeguard for the republic. If we are asleep, the system crumbles because men are not angels.
Democracy dies in docility. If we fail to demand of our leaders elections of the highest integrity, we will reap what we sow.
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
This is the definition of voter fraud. Pennsylvania election observers filed a complaint against the Delaware County Board of Elections after county officials took a detour on election night with the county’s ballots and v-drives into a closed building for six hours. Poll watchers were prevented from entering the building at the time.
The county also deleted 194 voter registrations that were deleted after election day whose ballots were counted.
PA Voters File Lawsuit to Delay Certification After Officials Detoured from Counting Center into a Closed Building for 6 Hours on Election Day
It’s too bad we no longer have a DOJ or law enforcement who will investigate actions like this. They’re too busy plotting against Trump supporters.
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
IN IT TO WIN IT!
It’s Kari Lake, and I wanted to update you on what’s happening in our fight against Arizona’s sham elections and those who run them. For starters, I want you to know that I am firmly in this fight with you. Maricopa County just couldn’t wait to certify their botched election, the botched election where half of Election Day voting centers were inoperable, the botched election where Election Day printers caused mayhem across the county, the botched election where Arizonans were expected to wait in line two, three, four, even five hours simply to exercise their sacred right to vote. Arizonans were told to throw their vote into a drawer, where it might ultimately end up in a plastic bin or a trash bag. Maricopa County, where it took two weeks to count, is the poster child for broken, botched elections. But, if you bring up any of these issues, you are labeled an election denier or a conspiracy theorist.
They don’t want us talking about our shoddy elections under any circumstances. They shut us down and made us fear exercising our freedom of speech, and they canceled anyone who questioned past elections.
Because of that, many Americans did not speak out, and nothing was done to shore up elections. And now, we are paying the price again. Arizona, America, if we do not stand up and speak up right now about the most dishonest elections in the history of Arizona, I truly fear for our future. Our sacred vote is supposed to be the great equalizer of the people. And right now, our vote has been trampled upon.
We must work hard right now to save it. This is our last chance. Those of you who are speaking out about what happened on November 8, those who testified before the corrupt Board of Supervisors, thank you, and God bless each of you. I am with you.
Here’s what I’m busy working on. I’m working with a team of patriotic, talented lawyers on a legal case to challenge the botched elections. My team and I realize how important this case is and what is at stake. We will file this case in accordance with Arizona state law. And you will want to stay tuned for this one. Trust me.
So many have expressed concern about Maricopa County’s certification. I agree. This botched election should not be certified, especially in Maricopa County, where the board of supervisors are well aware of the catastrophic issues caused by maladministration of Supervisor Bill Gates and County Recorder Stephen Richer, who started a dark money PAC with the sole purpose of going after me, my campaign, and our movement, while they supervised the election.
Let me repeat that. They ran an election with my name on the ballot, and their number one political goal was to see to it that I was not elected. Can you say conflict of interest?
Another member of the Board of Supervisors charged with certifying this botched election has been chosen to be on Katie Hobbs’ transition team. Another conflict of interest.
And perhaps the greatest conflict of interest of all: Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, the woman in charge of running her own election, who did almost zero campaigning, oversaw the botched election, is now threatening counties with legal action if they do not crown her Governor by certifying the election that she botched.
You simply can’t make this stuff up. Add to this the Attorney General’s letter implying wrongdoing in this election. It would give any honest person, any ethical person, pause to investigate and correct any issues, even after certification. The multiple conflicts of interest, the incompetence, the maladministration, the ignorance, and the disrespect of voters is off the charts with those managing and operating our elections.
We the people will not forget, God will not forget, and I will not quit.
I want to ease your mind a bit. My case, our case moves forward with these sham certifications. In fact, state statute requires certification before our case can move forward. You know how hard I worked on the campaign trail leading our movement to bring common sense solutions to our problems. I am taking that same work ethic and using it behind the scenes right now, building a strong legal case. While we come together on this unifying issue of restoring honesty to our elections, rest assured, Arizona, nothing will stop me from putting everything I have into reforming elections here in Arizona and in America.
BREAKING: “I WILL NOT QUIT” – Kari Lake Speaks Out On Certification Of Corrupt Election By Corrupt Election Officials – LAWSUIT INCOMING (VIDEO)
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
HERE'S HOW THEY DID IT: REAL TIME ELECTION FRAUD
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3. Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
National Change of Address Database (NCOA) will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine -- except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database -- the one that was changed, then changed back.
Many states send ballots to everyone; the recipient is none the wiser that they never received a mail-in ballot. They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?
Welcome to database latency.
Our bad guy pals know they can change voter rolls, take an action, then change them back. Who would know?
A thousand voters are changed from inactive, voted, then changed back, and how would you ever know? With lots of complex footwork, you could eventually tell from their voter history file -- months after the election.
What are you going to do about it? Reverse the election?
The new, and current “ballot gathering strategy” mandated by the almost universal mail-in ballots adds pretty cool database games -- exploiting database latency.
Database latency, as you likely gathered, is when current reality lags the underlying record. We all experience it in our electronics-driven society.
The ballot gathering scammers know about latency -- it’s their ground game!
Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:
• Count the in-person votes on election day.
• Count the early, in-person votes.
• Shut down the system (Atlanta water leak, Maricopa County everything).
• Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes, then
changed them back.
• Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
• Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.
Let’s take a short walk into the future of how we fight ballot gathering with technology -- just a fun little peek.
We know an election commission is going to do anything possible to make the Democrat win. Wisconsin Election Commission, Arizona’s Maricopa County, seven states in 2016, for instance.
Rather than wasting time on batch NCOA, we get a daily copy of the election roll. That’s expensive! The list in Wisconsin is $12,000! But did you know your Democrat friends bought it 28 times before the 2016 election?
What is a governorship worth? How much does a contested Senate seat cost? Maybe $50 million? What is a presidential campaign worth?
Why would anyone spend $50 million on a Senate seat and let the other side own the election rolls? That is a question Ronna McDaniel may be asked by Mike Lindell!
We take that election roll, with perhaps 15 million voters, Florida, for instance, or Texas -- compare every voter against every other voter and address, down to the cell level, and see any differences -- every day!
What do we find?
In a real-life example, this month, we found a county that changed 31,500 zip codes, yet the voter remained at the same address. Curious?
That means the voter did not change their address, continued to receive all their mail, except one item -- a ballot sent from a voter commission.
Our teams in Wisconsin and Florida are discovering this scam by the truckload -- do not email me that it is not real! And NCOA and Melissa? They are totally blind to this -- because the addresses are changed back!
The Fractal team spent the last 20 months, with guidance from Mike Lindell, encouragement from the great Sheriff David Clarke, and over a dozen election integrity teams advancing voter integrity analysis from the ancient, batch, latent to the modern, current real-time.
We learned the core strategy to fight ballot-gathering fraud in real time analysis of voter rolls and cast ballots. It is also real-time analysis of ballot collection points -- like large apartment complexes and dorms where ballots gather because there is not an apartment number.
The question now is whether Republicans want to start leading with technology or continue to spend millions on “big data” “data driven” batch buzzwords.
We are about to find out.
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
Are Free and Fair Elections a Thing of the Past? Reviewing the Unexplainable 2022 Election Results
The 2024 election is already over unless material changes take place across the country and quickly. Let’s review the unexplainable 2022 election results to date in some key states. 
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
“We have put forward evidence that unquestionably shows that this election was stolen with illegal votes and likely fraudulent votes.”
The lawsuit begins, “the eyes of the Country are on Arizona. On November 3o, 2022, Rasmussen Reports published a poll of likely U.S. voters asking about the Election Day problems with vote tabulation in Maricopa County. This poll asked whether responding voters agreed or disagreed with Contestant Kari Lake’s statement calling the election ‘botched’ and stating, ‘This isn’t about Republicans or Democrats. This is about our sacred right to vote, a right that many voters were, sadly, deprived of on [Election Day], November 8th.’ The results of that poll are stunning, Severnty-two percent (72%) of Likely Voters said they agree with Lake’s statement, including 45% who Strongly Agree.”
Never in US history has there been so much evidence compiled of a fraudulent election taking place.
In the filing this afternoon, the Kari Lake campaign claims HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of illegal votes were counted in the election, 59% of Maricopa County precincts had broken tabulators or printers on election day disenfranchising voters, and tens of thousands of illegal mail-in ballots were counted that did not pass signature verification requirements.
The remedy for illegal absentee ballots is either to set aside the election under Miller, 179 Ariz. at 180, or proportionately to reduce each candidate’s share of mail-in ballots under Grounds, 67 Ariz. at 183 85.
As set forth above, the Maricopa County election board and the election officers in Maricopa County engaged in misconduct that nullifies the results of the 2022 election in Maricopa County, by failing to prevent the entirely foreseeable problems that afflicted the voting at Vote Centers on Election Day; and by failing to follow Arizona law with respect to signature verification and chain of custody.
Kari Lake’s team of expert attorneys have gathered evidence from signed witness testimony, Runbeck whistleblowers, and Maricopa County whistleblowers to craft a 68-page lawsuit against Maricopa County and Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.
BREAKING: Kari Lake Files 70 Page Lawsuit to Throw Out Fraudulent Arizona Midterm Election Results – Claims HUNDREDS of Thousands of Illegal Ballots, 59% of ED Precinct Machine Failures, Tens of Thousands of Illicit Mail-in Ballots – FILING INCLUDED
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
Included in the complaint is a shocking claim by a Runbeck employee that nearly 300,000 ballots were delivered to Runbeck on Election Day with no chain of custody documentation.
Maricopa County is the only jurisdiction in the country that picks up completed ballots at USPS Processing Distribution Center but doesn’t bring them back to the election department or tabulation center. Instead, Maricopa County picks up mail-in ballots and takes them directly to its print vendor Runbeck Election Services, which is headquartered in Phoenix.
The Gateway Pundit has reported on Runbeck’s services in Maricopa County. The County has still not provided all chain of custody documents from Runbeck and USPS for the 2020 election.
The scanning of ballot envelopes takes place behind closed doors and apparently with no documentation.
According to Kari Lake’s lawsuit contesting the 2022 election, a Runbeck employee stated that “Runbeck received 298,942 ballots on Election Day, which includes the EV ballots. The required chain of custody for these ballots does not exist.”
Maricopa County also asked Runbeck how many ballots were received on election night, demonstrating that they did not even know how many ballots were in Runbeck’s custody.
Further, Maricopa County did not produce a single Early Voting Ballot Transport Statement (EVBTS) chain of custody document from Election Day drop box ballot retrievals. Early Voting Ballot Transport Statements are required every time ballots are retrieved from a vote center or drop box.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on a 2020 Election report from Verity Vote discovered that 740,000 ballots lacked completed Early Voting Ballot Transport Statements. 1514 out of 1895 unique EVBTS forms had no ballot counts.
HUGE: Runbeck Whistleblower Reveals That Chain Of Custody For OVER 298,942 Maricopa County Ballots Delivered To Runbeck On Election Day Did Not Exist, Employees Allowed To Add Family Members’ Ballots Without Any Documentation
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
CALL TO ACTION
1) Mail a letter to SCOTUS. The text is provided in the link but please make sure you add a P.S. Handwritten is best since personalization is extremely meaningful. Have your kids and grandkids send a letter as well. Ask them to draw a picture or decorate with stickers!
CLICK HERE to go directly to the document which you can print, edit, personalize and mail.
2) Copy your letter.
3) MAIL the original to the Supreme Court and MAIL a copy to the Brunson Brothers. This is critical so the Brunson legal team can validate the amount of letters the Supreme Court is receiving. DECEMBER 15 DEADLINE
Supreme Court Address:
Supreme Court of the United States
Attn: Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr. and All Associate Justices
1 First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543.
Brunson Address:
Loy & Raland Brunson
4287 South Harris Blvd. Apt. 132
Ogden, Utah 84403
4) Consider donating to the Brunsons to help pay for the legal costs of this litigation – CLICK HERE.
5) Send these instructions to your friends and family. Have letter-writing parties or host a zoom call to write letters together. Be creative, action-oriented, and effective! Reach out overseas: America may be the last light out unless we all come together.
6) Time is of essence. Please mail NOW.
CLICK TO VIEW/DOWNLOAD SCOTUS 22-380 SAMPLE LETTER in PDF format
To read the original posts with greater detail, go to:
https://prayingmantis.su...ack.com/p/scotus-save-us
Here is the link to the letter itself:
https://docs.google.com/...IKKWWkg2Nt8HQSZ2oA/edit#
Here is a link to a site with a chronology of the lawsuit:
https://www.newstreason....ase-summary-and-timeline
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH – THIS CASE IS ALL OVER THE INTERNET.
BUT GET THOSE LETTERS WRITTEN TODAY!
Brunson v Adams: SCOTUS Election Integrity Case
WILL SCOTUS TAKE THIS ON? The Four Brunson Brothers Are Suing Biden, Harris, Pence And 385 Members of Congress for Refusing to Investigate Whether ‘Enemies of The Constitution’ Rigged The 2020 Presidential Election
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. In contrast, a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.
The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.
It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for Justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” In addition to such institutional threats to the Supreme Court, several Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their personal security since the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
The fact that the Brunson case has made it to the Court’s docket suggests profound concerns about a lawless January 6th Congressional committee, politicized federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies, and major constitutional violations intended to overthrow an elected government by manipulating the outcome of the presidential election.
Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
Evidently, to try to speed up its signature verification process, Maricopa County election officials took an unproven approach in the recent general election by delegating to a private corporation and its software (“the Delegated Software”) the crucial job of assessing the veracity of signatures on approximately 1.3 million mail-in ballots and presumably ballots retrieved from drop boxes. Maricopa intended that the Delegated Software would compare a voter’s signature on a mail-in ballot or ballot retrieved from a drop box against a signature exemplar the voter had signed in the past, such as a record from the Department of Motor Vehicles. Untrained temporary workers would then be hired to review the software’s adjudications. But County election officials indulged this experiment without first putting in place safeguards to make sure it worked.
The law is well settled that, “once the legislature prescribes a particular voting procedure, the right to vote in that precise manner is a fundamental right.” See Charfauros v. Bd. of Elections, 249 F.3d 941, 951 (9th Cir. 2001) (emphasis added). Changes to voting procedures that disenfranchise certain voters are a per se violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment—even if the violation is well intended or based on simple negligence or ineptitude. While elected officials in Maricopa County may have felt required to take shortcuts due to time constraints, “[t]he press of time does not diminish the constitutional concern. A desire for speed is not a general excuse for ignoring equal protection guarantees.” Gore, 531 U.S. at 108, 121 S. Ct. at 523. Here, Maricopa County officials:
(1) Failed uniformly to administer the general election consistent with state mandated procedures;
(2) Adopted unproven and misguided procedures to cope with its handling of the election;
(3) Poorly implemented those procedures, which became more burdensome than available alternatives prescribed by law; and
(4) Relied on unproven, proprietary software of a nongovernmental, third-party to initially verify ballot signatures, thereby interjecting artificial intelligence into the voting process in a manner not prescribed by law.
RELIEF SOUGHT:
Invalidate and set aside the 2022 Maricopa County general election results for the race for governor, and/or and invalidate and set aside all Maricopa County mail-in ballots in the 2022 general election for governor.
EXCLUSIVE: AZ State Sen. Sonny Borrelli Lawsuit Against Maricopa County Includes Evidence Maricopa Performed Illegal Voter Signature Verifications – FILING AND SHOCKING EXHIBITS INCLUDED
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer testified Wednesday during GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake’s election challenge trial that the individual polling locations did not tally the total number of votes cast in the midterm elections, a seeming violation of state law.
“On Election Day it would’ve been easy for you to figure out how many ballots you received,”
He responded, “Well, we had to get them all in and it was quite a process throughout the night.”
Blehm interjected, “You can look at the forms and add the numbers. Correct?”
“They’re not counted at the individual loading locations,” Richer said. “They are counted when they get back to MCTEC and then they are recounted at Runbeck.”
MCTEC is the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center in downtown Phoenix and Runbeck is the company the county uses to process and scan ballots.
“Does anybody know when those ballots leave the voting centers how many are in the bins?” Blehm asked.
“When the early ballots leave the voting centers, no, they are not counted at the voting centers,” Richer answered.
Blehm followed up, “Nobody knows how many [ballots] are in the bins when they arrive at MCTEC. Correct?”
“Correct,” Richer said.
The 2019 Arizona elections procedures manual, which cites state law, requires an audit at each voting location of the total number of ballots cast. The results must be recorded in an official ballot report.
The audit even requires accounting for the total amount of ballot stock paper on-site. The ballots cast must then be placed in sealed boxes.
The Western Journal spoke with former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, who said Maricopa County should have known the total number of ballots on Election Day or certainly by the day after.
Each voting center, he explained, should have reported the exact number of voters and the number of early ballots that were dropped off.
The county must be able to answer the question, “How many ballots are we responsible for?” Bennett said.
Kari Lake Election Challenge Trial Reveals Major Confession - Is This a Game-Changer?
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
|
|
|
Rank: Queen Joined: 6/21/2003 Posts: 563
|
Jumpin' up, fallin' down
Don't misunderstand me
You don't think that I know your plan
What you tryin' to hand me?
|
|
|